|
|
Post by gladstone on Nov 17, 2023 14:54:49 GMT -5
I've been listening to, in my words,
Billy vs. Brushy by Gale Cooper on You Tube. Apparently, she was a Dr. Of pathology for murder investigations.
She seems to throw a lot of shade at Morrison and Brushy. Does anyone have any instances where her facts were wrong?
Opinions don't count. In the words of Joe Friday, "Just the facts."
She seems like a woman scorned and is out to show Morrison a liar and Brushy a fraud.
I'm looking for instances where she was wrong/mistaken.
|
|
|
|
Post by chivato88 on Nov 17, 2023 17:55:35 GMT -5
I liked her books but she she was against the exhumation of the burial site at Sumner with others, and blocked it. She lost credibility with me doing that. And I think she's kinda of hypocrite and a nutcase...
|
|
|
|
Post by billybarlowofficial on Nov 18, 2023 19:59:25 GMT -5
I never understood her stake in the game. Because from my understanding she is largely a fiction writer. She just came out of nowhere and leveled that lawsuit against Sederwall and everybody involved bringing everything to an end.
Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you all
|
|
|
|
Post by gladstone on Nov 19, 2023 12:54:05 GMT -5
In her 1st video, she explains how she got involved. Stopped into a bookstore and just happened to buy wnb book. Read it and got hooked by the mystery. I suppose it appealed to her career as a pathologist. She sold her medical practice and dove into it. She seems to have so many documents to back up what she's saying. I wasn't sure if anyone had found errors in her facts. I never understood her stake in the game. Because from my understanding she is largely a fiction writer. She just came out of nowhere and leveled that lawsuit against Sederwall and everybody involved bringing everything to an end. Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you all |
|
|
|
Post by texas truth teller on Dec 2, 2023 22:22:38 GMT -5
I've been listening to, in my words, Billy vs. Brushy by Gale Cooper on You Tube. Apparently, she was a Dr. Of pathology for murder investigations. She seems to throw a lot of shade at Morrison and Brushy. Does anyone have any instances where her facts were wrong? Opinions don't count. In the words of Joe Friday, "Just the facts." She seems like a woman scorned and is out to show Morrison a liar and Brushy a fraud. I'm looking for instances where she was wrong/mistaken. Records confirm many of Gale's statements about Brushy and Morrison are accurate. Information cited in letters cannot be confirmed or disputed. No evidence has been found that indicates Morrison was an attorney. Her facts are correct unless specific claims are disproven with verifiable facts. |
|
45colt
20 - 49 Posts
Posts: 25
|
Post by 45colt on Jan 4, 2024 14:10:36 GMT -5
I've been listening to, in my words, Billy vs. Brushy by Gale Cooper on You Tube. Apparently, she was a Dr. Of pathology for murder investigations. She seems to throw a lot of shade at Morrison and Brushy. Does anyone have any instances where her facts were wrong? Opinions don't count. In the words of Joe Friday, "Just the facts." She seems like a woman scorned and is out to show Morrison a liar and Brushy a fraud. I'm looking for instances where she was wrong/mistaken. Records confirm many of Gale's statements about Brushy and Morrison are accurate. Information cited in letters cannot be confirmed or disputed. No evidence has been found that indicates Morrison was an attorney. Her facts are correct unless specific claims are disproven with verifiable facts. You and I don't agree on many things but I respect your research enough to say that you are better than this comment. Morrison was a "lawyer" in the 1940s and into the 1950s. He was not a member of the bar. I did a whole video on this subject. The idea that he wasn't an lawyer came from someone who is not a credible historian at all, he is an anti-brushy pundit and this is one of his talking points that is dishonest because what it omits is material information. There is a lot of evidence Morrison worked in the legal profession and by the definition of his time he was a lawyer. Also, the University of New Mexico Press put out Alias Billy the Kid and C.L. Sonnichsen was co-writer on the book. They state in the note from the publisher that while they may not agree with all the conclusions they believe it to be the product of honest research. The book refers to Morrison as a "lawyer" four times. I have envelopes addressed to Mr. Morrison as "Attorney at Law" although as I mentioned Alias says "lawyer" and not "attorney". To say he wasn't an "attorney" is semantics and dishonest in my opinion. Not calling you dishonest because as I said, I think you are better than this. As for the original poster's question, I'm not aware of a single thing that has been proven against Brushy Bill or Morrison by that person. All I know is a lot of people say "conspiracy" and "Hoax" when there is absolutely ZERO evidence of a hoax by Mr. Morrison and lots of evidence to the contrary. I just mentioned the statements of the Univ of NM Press but there are many more. I also have all of Mr. Morrison's correspondence with Roberts. No hoax, no coaching, no shenanigans. Exactly the opposite and yet the same people that claim without actual evidence Garrett killed the Kid other than he and others "said so" will say without actual evidence Morrison and Brushy were hoaxers. Lame!!! |
|
