|
|
Post by mwb on Sept 10, 2010 8:37:33 GMT -5
Just noticed this morning that the much anticipated web site is up and running! I'll be anxious for some discussion once we have a chance to review. Here's the link: http://www.billythekidcase.com./BillytheKidCase/Home_Page.html
|
|
|
|
Post by mwb on Sept 10, 2010 8:59:06 GMT -5
It's a pay site! There's absolutely nothing of substance unless you pay $25.00 and become a member. Unfortunately, I suspect that's what you'd also get for your $25.00. Great build up, no payoff.
|
|
|
|
Post by mwb on Sept 15, 2010 8:17:38 GMT -5
I put this out there incorrectly, apparently. It's just www.billythekidcase.com Website is up. I'd be interested as to what everyone thinks. |
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Land on Sept 30, 2010 15:34:27 GMT -5
I joined the "posse" a couple weeks ago and have perused most of the pages. New content is being added fairly often and so far I must say considering all the personal time and money that Steve Sederwall put into the investigation, he probably deserves to recoup some of that through the $25 fee and I didn't mind paying it.
I can't say whether anyone else will feel the content is worth the money but I have enjoyed seeing the many documents and photos related to the investigation. I can at least affirm that the site is pretty extensive with details about the Kid and his cohorts that I had never seen anywhere else, and it is growing.
BTW, he doesn't really mention Brushy at the site but there is some interesting logic as to Garrett's willingness to lie and statements by contemporaries that Billy wasn't killed by Garrett. And there is evidence that makes it pretty clear that Brady still had a rifle and a pistol, after he was killed. That means the Kid did not run out to the body to take Brady's rifle. Brushy said he was trying to recover his pearl handled revolver. Brady may or may not have had such a revolver with him at the time, but he did not have one after he was killed. I'd like to believe this supports Brushy's story, but unfortunately it is an extremely weak argument.
There's some intriguing CSI stuff regarding the courthouse, the Tunstall murder site, etc. and an extremely detailed timeline.
|
|
