|
Post by Wayne Land on Sept 17, 2023 17:49:50 GMT -5
I know we can't prove anything here. I just wanted to thank Missy for pointing out the lack of mention of the pinky ring by Garrett. Something, no one had thought about before. Of course, it's possible the body did have a pinky ring. It's possible there was a ring but it was a different one. Many, many things are possible. I'm not stupid. But it is true, absolutely true, that Garrett did not mention a pinky ring, at least not publicly. That in itself is evidence to anyone who wants to be objective. I should not have said "there was no pinky ring". That was an error. But I still believe the fact it wasn't mentioned is evidence that does support Brushy's claim. I'm sure there are those who will disagree. That's why we're here in the first place. If we all agreed, this board would be pointless. At the same time, if we refuse to even allow each other to present ideas, then this board would be just as useless.
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Land on Sept 17, 2023 17:52:29 GMT -5
BTW, if we all agreed then there would also be no purpose for "All Things Billy The Kid".
|
|
|
Post by RonBk on Sept 18, 2023 9:08:07 GMT -5
This is clearly another piece of circumstantial evidence in favour of Brushy being Billy the kid. It's far from the most important piece of evidence, but it definitely adds further to the overwhelming evidence previously presented. It seems highly unlikely Billy the kid was buried with the ring still on his finger and no one ever mentioned this.
|
|